A few Sundays ago my sermon mentioned proposed federal
legislation with the Orwellian name, the "Freedom of Choice Act" (FOCA). In
essence, FOCA would be the arrogation of power by the Federal government to
require physicians and hospitals to perform abortions whether or not doing so
violated their consciences, medical oaths, institutional policies, or the US
Constitution (to say nothing of the laws of God!) and to require taxpayer
funding of the carnage. Such legislation would be, of course, at variance
with our Declaration of Independence which proclaims the right to "life,
liberty, and the pursuit of happiness," and with various Constitutional
guarantees of the fifth
amendments to our Constitution, to be safe from deprivation of life, liberty, or
property without the due process of law determined by the jury trial guaranteed
by amendment seven.
The violation of individual consciences certainly contravenes the first
amendment right to the "free exercise of religion." It is a clear
violation of amendment thirteen,
which forbids the enslavement of innocent citizens, equally as abortionists,
field hands, or house slaves. And, à fortiori the whole notion of
a federal law of this nature violates the tenth
amendment, for the Constitution enumerates no federal powers whatsoever over the
practice of medicine or murder.
In my sermon I
... if passed, FOCA will not be the final step. Rather, the government will be
emboldened to determine just who gets what kind of healthcare if any, who gets
to have children, and literally who gets to live or die.
Very much to my chagrin, it is now being
reported that a great deal of this life‑and‑death government control
over healthcare will come to pass long before FOCA gets introduced into the new
Congress and comes out of committee for a vote by the House and Senate—indeed,
that it will come to pass even if FOCA never sees the light of day.
In a February 9th Bloomberg.com
article, Betsy McCaughey, a former lieutenant governor of New York State
(Page numbers refer to H.R.
1 EH, pdf version).
The bill’s health rules will affect “every
individual in the United States” (445, 454, 479). Your medical treatments
will be tracked electronically by a federal system. Having electronic medical
records at your fingertips, easily transferred to a hospital, is beneficial.
It will help avoid duplicate tests and errors.
But the bill goes further. One new bureaucracy,
the National Coordinator of
Health Information Technology [URL added], will monitor treatments to make
sure your doctor is doing what the federal government deems appropriate and
cost effective. The goal is to reduce costs and “guide” your doctor’s
decisions (442, 446). These provisions in the stimulus bill are virtually
identical to what [Senator Tom] Daschle prescribed in his 2008 book, “Critical: What We
Can Do About the Health-Care Crisis.” According to Daschle, doctors have to
give up autonomy and “learn to operate less like solo practitioners.”...
Hospitals and doctors that are not “meaningful
users” of the new system will face penalties. “Meaningful user” isn’t
defined in the bill. That will be left to the HHS secretary, who will be
empowered to impose “more stringent measures of meaningful use over time”
(511, 518, 540-541)
What penalties will deter your doctor from
going beyond the electronically delivered protocols when your condition is
atypical or you need an experimental treatment? The vagueness is intentional.
In his book, Daschle proposed an appointed body with vast powers to make the
“tough” decisions elected politicians won’t make.
The stimulus bill does that, and calls it the
Federal Coordinating Council for Comparative Effectiveness Research (190-192).
The goal, Daschle’s book explained, is to slow the development and use of
new medications and technologies because they are driving up costs. He praises
Europeans for being more willing to accept “hopeless diagnoses” and “forgo
experimental treatments,” and he chastises Americans for expecting too much
from the health-care system....
Daschle says health-care reform “will not be
pain free.” Seniors should be more accepting of the conditions that come
with age instead of treating them. That means the elderly will bear the brunt.
Medicare now pays for treatments deemed safe
and effective. The stimulus bill would change that and apply a cost-
effectiveness standard set by the Federal Council (464).
The Federal Council is modeled after a U.K.
board discussed in Daschle’s book. This board approves or rejects treatments
using a formula that divides the cost of the treatment by the number of years
the patient is likely to benefit. Treatments for younger patients are more
often approved than treatments for diseases that affect the elderly, such as
In 2006, a U.K. health board decreed that
elderly patients with macular degeneration had to wait until they went blind
in one eye before they could get a costly new drug to save the other eye. It
took almost three years of public protests before the board reversed its
The stimulus bill will affect every part of
health care, from medical and nursing education, to how patients are treated
and how much hospitals get paid. The bill allocates more funding for this
bureaucracy than for the Army, Navy, Marines, and Air Force combined (90-92,
Hiding health legislation in a stimulus bill is
intentional. Daschle supported the Clinton administration’s health-care
overhaul in 1994, and attributed its failure to debate and delay. A year ago,
Daschle wrote that the next president should act quickly before critics mount
an opposition. “If that means attaching a health-care plan to the federal
budget, so be it,” he said. “The issue is too important to be stalled by
There is a fourth
amendment "right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses,
papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures" that seems
to have gone the way of the others.
Beyond the dangers to your health posed
by the "Stimulus" bill, one ought to consider the overall damage that
it will do to the nation. The Bush-Obama depression is very much like the Hoover-Roosevelt
depression of the 1930s and 40s. After attempting to spend the nation
to prosperity, and running out of things to spend money on, the whole fiasco
terminated in a bloody war to make the world safe for Communism.
The chart below comes from the official
US government website www.recovery.gov—another
euphemism. Apart from "tax relief" (and perhaps
"other") the chart lists nothing that is constitutional! The
figures total to $787 Billion dollars, including $288‑Billion in
"tax relief.." One might question question how the government
plans to pay for $787 Billion dollars worth of spending by collecting $288‑Billion less
in taxes. The answer, of course is the same borrowing and debasement of
the dollar that is at least partly to blame for getting us into this mess.
The $ 787‑Billion dollar legislation contains a clause raising the
national debt ceiling from its current $10.6‑Trillion by a whopping $1.54‑Trillion
to a record high of $12.14‑Trillion. No one should be surprised that
the debt ceiling was raised by twice as much as the legislation plans to spend—the
government never comes in "on budget"!
*State and Local Fiscal Relief
Infrastructure and science
Protecting the Vulnerable
* Tax Relief - includes $15 B for Infrastructure and Science, $61 B
for Protecting the Vulnerable, $25 B for Education and Training and $22 B
for Energy, so total funds are $126 B for Infrastructure and Science, $142 B
for Protecting the Vulnerable, $78 B for Education and Training, and $65 B
A Trillion, for those of us who are accustomed to counting
bills with George Washington's picture on them, is one with twelve zeros after
it. That means that the new debt ceiling will be written $12,140,000,000,000.
And see how rapidly we are approaching it:
But that is only the debt acknowledged on the books.
One must look a bit deeper to find our actual liabilities. Richard W.
Fisher, the President of the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas wrote:
Add together the unfunded liabilities from
Medicare and Social Security, and it comes to $99.2 trillion over the
infinite horizon. Traditional Medicare composes about 69 percent, the new drug
benefit roughly 17 percent and Social Security the remaining 14 percent.
Fisher is unusually candid for a "bankster," and
on last year's $700-Billion banking bailout are also of interest.
Let me close with another quote from my sermon:
The moral law may be more easy to
disobey than they physical laws of nature, but the consequences are
always sins against God, and very often they are crimes against men and women.
Our nation is founded upon the notion that all of us are “endowed by our
Creator with the unalienable rights” that come from His moral law. As
citizens and as Catholics, we must take our country back from the
“Progressives,” who would sin against us and against our God.
Send him mail
This article can be viewed full screen at
[ Home Page ]
[ Comment Archives ]