Ordinary of the Mass
Today's Mass text - Latin
Today's Mass text - English
“Jesus advanced in wisdom, and age, and
grace with God and men.”
That phrase at the end of today’s
Gospel says something significant about children—even the Christ child—God,
the Son of God—had to spend a number of years learning the things necessary
to function as an adult. Like all children, Jesus would learn these things
from His family. Indeed, when he introduced this feast of the Holy Family
in the early 1890s, Pope Leo XIII proposed the family of Jesus, Mary, and
Joseph as the exemplar for all family life. Mothers and fathers could find
the highest example of their vocations in Mary and Joseph, and children
would do best to pattern their lives on the child Jesus.
Pope Leo wrote at a time when many
forces threatened the sanctity of family life. The industrial revolution
induced many people to come to the cities where living conditions were
rather cramped, and children tended to be thought of as “mouths to feed” and
“bodies to be clothed” rather than as helpers on the family farm—when old
enough, they were sent off to work, often under poor conditions. Earlier in
the same century, methods of artificial birth control had been developed,
causing children to be thought of as a “disease” to be prevented.
In Pope Leo’s time, Europe was
racked by Masonic revolutions, which established governments that demanded
control over marriage, divorce, and the education of children, and stripped
the Church of its authority in these and other areas.
In his 1848 Communist Manifesto, Karl Marx intimated that women and
children were the common property of the state. Marx called for the
abolition of inheritances, so that families could not hand down their
property to their children, and demanded that all children be educated in
Pope Leo wrote over a hundred years
ago, and the situation has certainly become worse. Many of the “planks” of
the Communist Manifesto have been adopted by the so called
“progressives” in America and throughout the world. There are many, today,
who claim that parental rights come from government rather than from God.
They ignore the reality that individuals and families are the building
blocks of society, and not the other way around. Some even argue that there
are no parental rights because they are not mentioned in the Constitution or
the Declaration of Independence! Indeed, they are not, for the writers of
those documents knew that parental rights are natural rights, conferred by
“nature’s God”—this was unquestionable in the minds of the time—anyone who
didn't know it should have just gone back to sleep!
Even without divine revelation, or
even civil law, we know from the Natural Moral Law that men and women have
the right to life and property. The begetting of children is the natural
way in which these rights are protected. Men and women are created in such
a way that they are able to bring forth children, protect them from the
environment, and nurture them in such a way as to be capable of dealing with
the world. Often there is a certain degree of heroism and self-denial on
the part of parents carrying out these roles. We see much of this, even in
the animal kingdom—the bird that sits on the nest in the coldest weather,
for example, or the pelican who nourishes her young with her own blood.
Mother and father give life, sustenance, and wisdom to their children, and
have reason to expect the cooperation of their children in the tasks of life
and in old age.
Beyond this Natural Moral Law,
people in Christian society have the benefit of God’s revelation: “Honor
thy father and mother, as the Lord thy God hath commanded thee, that thou
mayest live a long time, and it may be well with thee in the land, which the
Lord thy God will give thee.”
As Pope Leo clearly pointed out, Christians have the example of the Holy
Family. The child Jesus “went down with them, and came to Nazareth, and was
subject to them.”
Saint Bernard points out that Jesus was subject to both Mary and Joseph.
God, who created all things and who holds them in existence, was subject to
His human parents.
But today we have ever more
intrusive governments that seek to take away the rights of parents, assign
them to the state, and delegate them back again only under compliance with
the directives of the state. It is not uncommon, today, to read of courts
taking children from their parents for trivial reasons and without due
process. Children are taken because their parents choose to educate them at
home, or because the government wants them to have unnecessary and even
dangerous medical treatments.
God help the family that will not allow the state to medicate their
children with psychotropic drugs!
And God help those children placed in the care of victimizing strangers by
Recently a lawsuit was brought against the Florida Division of Children and
Families—let me read from the Sun Sentinel article:
The suit describes how children from
infancy and older have suffered sexual abuse, beatings,
malnutrition, torture and, at the very least, alienation while in
the state's custody. They've been kept from siblings and other
family members, bounced from one crowded foster home to another, and
left to linger in shelters and treatment programs.
One toddler from Flagler County is now partially paralyzed after
being beaten by a foster parent. Two sisters from Manatee County
were tied by their wrists and ankles to their beds by their adoptive
parents and made to sleep on concrete surrounded by a brick cage. A
14-year-old Hillsborough County girl lived for a nearly a year in an
overcrowded foster home where children were punished with hot sauce
on their tongues and with their heads dunked in toilets.
Meanwhile, a 5-year-old Miramar girl has spent the past 26 months in
an emergency shelter without the benefit of a formal hearing placing
her in foster care, even though state law requires such a hearing be
held within 30 days of a child being removed from his or her home.
Lest anyone think that Florida is
unusual, it must be remembered that the primacy of government over families
is espoused by governments at all levels—even the global level of the United
Nations. The U.N., and nearly all of its members, have adopted something
euphemistically called the “Convention on the Rights of the Child.”
This “Convention” seeks to require all of the nations of the earth to make
children autonomous from their parents, allowing them to do as they please
without being subject to adult guidance.
The “Convention” requires
governments to interfere with parents’ ability to raise their own children:
how they are educated, what they eat, with whom they associate, their
practice or non‑practice
of religion, and how they may be disciplined. The government must require
prospective parents to obtain a revocable parenting license, provide
state-run day care, prosecute parents who violate the convention, and seize
the children of violators.
The “Convention” is supported by Modernist churchmen, who fully support the
mistaken notion that parental rights come from the state.
As I have mentioned many times before, there is very little difference
between Modernism and Marxism. “The Holy See regards the present Convention as a proper and laudable
instrument aimed at protecting the rights and interests of children, who are
‘that precious treasure given to each generation as a challenge to its
wisdom and humanity’ (Pope John Paul II, 26 April 1984).”
This “Convention on the Rights of
the Child” is a part of the U.N.’s larger agenda to govern the globe—an
agenda that must be resisted by all decent people.
To date, the United States have not signed off on this treaty, but portions
of it have been made into law in local jurisdictions. With the upcoming
elections this year, the issue of parental rights ought to be a serious
consideration in the mind of every citizen.
The rights of parents come from God,
and the paradigm of family life is given to us in the family of Jesus, Mary,
and Joseph. Together with Pope Leo XIII we can say: “the Holy Family
was destined to be a pattern to all others. For that very reason was it
established by the merciful designs of Providence, namely, that every
Christian, in every walk of life and in every place, might easily, ... have
before him a motive and a pattern for the good life.”—may
they pray for us and for all modern families, and may God bless us....